Okay, so Near Protocol's Intent layer is supposedly heating up, with nearly $4 billion in trading volume. Big deal. The crypto world throws around billions like it's Monopoly money. Are we really supposed to be impressed?
This "Intent layer" thing is supposed to automate on-chain swaps and cross-chain operations. Basically, it's supposed to make crypto easier to use. Which, let's be real, is like saying you're making brain surgery easier to perform. It's still brain surgery. And crypto is still crypto – a confusing mess for anyone who isn't living on Reddit 24/7.
They're bragging about Bitcoin and Zcash being actively traded on this layer. Of course they are. Those are the only two cryptos anyone's actually heard of outside of the die-hards. And stablecoins? Yeah, because everyone totally trusts those... It's like trusting a guy in a cheap suit who promises he's a Nigerian prince. Fool me once...
And get this: the Intent layer offers "gas abstraction," meaning fees can be paid in stablecoins. So, the demand for NEAR itself is "limited." Limited? That's putting it mildly. It's like building a fancy new highway that nobody wants to drive on. What's the point?
Near Protocol is supposedly on a "recovery run," breaking out of some "descending channel" on the daily chart. Technical analysis. Give me a break. It's astrology for dudes who wear hoodies and trade crypto in their mom's basement.
The article says retail interest is increasing. Oh, really? How do they know? Because some CoinGlass data shows Open Interest (OI) is up? Okay, so more people are gambling. That doesn't mean it's a good investment. It just means more people are willing to throw their money away.

And the OI-weighted funding rates are negative, meaning bears are paying a premium to hold short positions. Which, according to the article, could "further incentivize bulls to increase risk exposure." Or, you know, it could mean the bears are right and everyone else is about to get rekt.
This whole thing hinges on whether NEAR can close above $2.380. If it does, it might face opposition at $2.446. Then, maybe it'll target $2.705. It's all "ifs" and "maybes." It's like reading a fortune cookie written by a crypto bro.
Offcourse, if NEAR slips below $2.00, the whole thing is invalidated. Great. So, we're back to square one. It's a binary outcome: either it goes up, or it goes down. Groundbreaking analysis, folks.
I mean, look at the Relative Strength Index (RSI). It's above 50. So what? It could be below 50 tomorrow. These "technical indicators" are about as reliable as a politician's promise.
Maybe I'm just getting old and cranky.
Look, I'm not saying Near Protocol is a scam. But I'm also not not saying it's a scam. What I am saying is that the crypto world is full of hype and empty promises. This Intent layer thing sounds fancy, but it's probably just another way for insiders to get rich while everyone else gets burned. Wake me up when crypto actually solves a real-world problem, instead of just creating new ones.
Solet'sgetthisstraight.Occide...
Theterm"plasma"suffersfromas...
[GeneratedTitle]:AreWeReallyS...
AnAnalysisof'Mantra'asaFunct...
Ofcourse.Hereisthefeatureart...